WHO IS SPEAKING THE TRUTH?

The MACC’s chiefs told the news reporters that OTK was called up to ‘help’ in the investigation of the donation of RM 10 Million to MCA by Tiong and not about the PKFZ issue which is too complicated and has deep effects. OTK’s aide said that he was called up to be a witness in the PKFZ issue, whereas OTK admitted he was called up to help in the PKFZ issue and the case reported by Tiong.

An interesting question arises here: Who is speaking the truth?

My answer is straight forward: Both are NOT telling lies technically!

MACC is right in the sense that PKFZ’s issue is far too complicated and precarious, so much so that the effects can be very alarming. Consequently, they are still waiting for the right time and directive to carry out thorough investigations. In order not to let the alliance party having loopholes to complain against MACC merely going after the opposition party members, they have been trying their best to do the work despite shortage of man power. Many of the BN component parties’ members have been called up other than the alliance parties’ members. Since the issue about Tiong’s donation of RM 10 Million is an internationally super ‘hot cake’ in the eyes of the public, and both parties had launched police reports, it is more advisable for MACC to take swift action. I personally believe that the MACC acts independently and righteously in this issue.

OTK is not cheating in this case! We must believe that he has high moral values and he is a holy man. By looking at the big Buddhist beads he wears on his wrist, we can conclude that he is very devoted to Buddhism, which will never allow him to violate any of the Five Precepts of Buddhism:

The Five Precepts

1. Panatipata Veramani Sikkhapadam Samadiyami
2. Adinnadana Veramani Sikkhapadam Samadiyami
3. Kamesu Micchacara Veramani Sikkhapadam Samadiyami
4. Musavada Veramani Sikkhapadam Samadiyami
5. Suramerayamajja Pamadatthana Veramani Sikkhapadam Samadiyami

Subsequently, he will never lie, he will never have unlawful sexual affair, he will never kill (so bloggers, please don’t use the Chinese word Dr. Chua was ‘slaughtered’, he was only ‘sacked’, haha, so the first precept is NOT violated by him!), he never takes things not belonging to him (so second precept again not violated), but if some one wants to give him voluntarily, what’s wrong of him receiving? He is the boss, he will never be involved in incorrect speeches because all his followers must listen to him, no one can say ‘NO’ to him, so you Sabahan MCA members dared to go against him? He only chased you out, but not scolded you, so the fourth precept is also not violated. No one has the proof he drinks or drank before. That Mr. Lau from Johore alleged him of taking alcohol in Taiwan without proof, that’s why he deserved to be suspended as MCA member. So, he is not violating the fifth precept as well. As such, he is a holy man that no one can deny what he says!

In this case, definitely he speaks the truth. Maybe the MACC could have one sole intention initially: only investigate Tiong’s allegation against him about the donation of RM 10 Million to MCA through him by cash. But there is some thing which is very absurd and incongruous, how can Tiong passed cash to him? Any donation to a political party must be by cheques under the name of the party so that the money can be accounted for. Don’t forget, he is a very good debater. He had thrashed Lim GE once in a trilingual debate. With his holy and innocent look and superb ability to table his facts, what is so difficult for him to relate the allegation to his investigation into the PKFZ’ misclaims? So the whole issue of investigating Tiong’s allegation against him becomes the explanation of the PKFZ as a major issue and allegation of the donation of RM 10 Million as a minor issue.

Consequently, a small inference here:

Both Are Not Telling Lies!